“We’ve seen action, real action, concrete action, where the government in Beijing has started to cut off the flow of precursor chemicals and taken action against the Chinese companies that were involved,” Burns said, adding that since then We focused on the need for technology. Export restrictions.
“We are never going to allow the People’s Liberation Army to acquire our most sensitive technologies so that they can compete with us militarily. We are also not going to allow these advanced semiconductors or We will not compromise on any other technical restrictions we have introduced,” he added.
Chinese Ambassador Xie Feng appeared to say in a prerecorded video address to the Carter Center audience that these restrictions were an impediment to improving relations.
Despite US chip limits, China will continue AI development in 2024: UBS
Despite US chip limits, China will continue AI development in 2024: UBS
Xie suggested that the U.S. government’s characterization of China as a “compete” (a term used by the U.S. State Department to describe some areas in which the two countries are involved) is akin to “containment.” .
“Improving and stabilizing bilateral relations would be out of the question if we view the other country as a major competitor, a ‘threat to slow down’ and a target for containment,” he said.
White House and Pentagon officials have described China as a “threat to slow down,” and Biden told Chinese President Xi Jinping at their November summit that the two countries are “competing.” Ta.
“The United States should adhere to the one-China principle and the three China-US joint communiqués with concrete actions. [and] “The United States will sincerely implement the U.S. leader’s statement that it does not support Taiwan’s independence,” Hsieh said.
Burns called Beijing’s response to Pelosi’s visit “overreach,” and did not reiterate the U.S. government’s often-held position that it does not support Taiwan’s independence.
Although most countries, including the United States, do not recognize Taiwan as an independent state, the United States opposes any attempt to occupy Taiwan by force and is committed to supporting Taiwan’s defense capabilities.
Despite their contradictory comments on Taiwan and technology regulation, the two envoys were upbeat on several fronts, including fentanyl and the resumption of high-level military-to-military dialogue.
The two leaders expressed optimism about the joint effort to control the use of artificial intelligence that Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to at their summit, which will incorporate artificial intelligence technology into autonomous weapons. It suggested that it was aimed at danger.
The artificial intelligence talks aim to “strengthen global AI governance and jointly manage the risks and challenges posed by technology to prevent a Terminator scenario in which machines go to war with humans.” Mr. Xie said.
But in that regard, Burns suggested that the two countries are still considering who should take part in the negotiations.
“We need to decide who should be at the table,” he said. “In the case of the United States, it’s obviously government representatives, but it also includes representatives from the private sector, where much of the expertise in artificial intelligence resides.”
The Pentagon’s announcement, released just hours after Burns and Xie’s meeting, highlighted improvements in bilateral relations in the military field.
U.S., wary of China’s ambitions, still won’t join U.N. agreement on maritime rights and interests
U.S., wary of China’s ambitions, still won’t join U.N. agreement on maritime rights and interests
Michael Chase, assistant secretary of defense for China, Taiwan, and Mongolia, announced that he met with China’s Maj. Gen. Song Yanchao, deputy director of the Central Military Commission’s Bureau of International Military Cooperation, at the Pentagon on Monday and Tuesday for policy coordination dialogue. In response to the Department of Defense statement.
Like Burns, Chase’s discussion also included positive and controversial messages.
According to the Pentagon, Chase emphasized “the importance of maintaining open communication between militaries to prevent competition from escalating into conflict,” while also stressing that China’s military “has no legal operations in the South China Sea.” “Harassment of Philippine vessels”
Ships from China and the Philippines have collided in waters near Scarborough Shoal and Second Thomas Shoal in the South China Sea. Both reefs are claimed by Manila and China, which have forged close military ties with the United States in response to these tensions.